I found myself wondering today why Ron Paul has been completely absent from media coverage of the Merrill Lynch sale and Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. Paul, more than any other candidate for president this year, made an issue of the government's management of the economy and how he believes we're being led off a cliff. He would no doubt have a lot to say, given his remarks in May against proposed House bills to bail out mortgage lenders:
It is neither morally right nor fiscally wise to socialize private losses in this way.
The solution is for government to stop micromanaging the economy and let the market adjust, as painful as that will be for some. We should not force taxpayers, including renters and more frugal homeowners, to switch places with the speculators and take on those same risks that bankrupted them. It is a terrible idea to spread the financial crisis any wider or deeper than it already is, and to prolong the agony years into the future. Socializing the losses now will only create more unintended consequences that will give new excuses for further government interventions in the future. This is how government grows - by claiming to correct the mistakes it earlier created, all the while constantly shaking down the taxpayer. The market needs a chance to correct itself, and Congress needs to avoid making the situation worse by pretending to ride to the rescue.
In a search of Google News, I could find no evidence that Paul has been interviewed about the current financial crisis. I did find a speech he made on the floor of the House of Representatives in March.
"Rogers hacked my compter Tad, you might be next."
Get serious, Rex. I actually don't see why you continue to take me for your fool, you're so ineffective at it.
Even if in this reality of "Homeland Security" Rogers took the chance to break through (all those potential site's covering-their-buttocks-
against-suit) lots of firewalls ... for what Earthly reason?
To find out what an ex-financial advisor reads on the internet?
I'd actually love to find a pinche pequeno tirantito like that! Snooping on conservatives for the good of the Party!
I tried finding one over at the Drudge Retort, but *damn*, they are as stupid as rocks over there. Much smarter, here but still self-blinded and purposefully stupid ... Rogers refuses to engage; except by the typical misdirection. Too intellectually shy himself, I suppose.
Are you ad mining, Rogers?
Anyway, this article is just some of the first desperate attempts to misdirect commentary away from the fact that Democrats are those who forced the housing industry into accepting doubtful loans, and even had penalties for not complying with poor credit loans which were "requested" to be given for homes.
First, it was Bush's fault, until it became evident that this was one of those bipartisan efforts on Bush's part in words only. He didn't ask for it, but hoped it would be successful when he had to sign it into law ... or shut down the government.
Now, it is "interesting" that Paul hates Bush for signing the bill! You asked for some interesting "other" stuff, Mikey ...
The mortgage giants have given *LARGE* donations to Obama and other Democrats!
Of course, the "Progressive" faithful will be moaning and thrashing in their pews about how it is somebody else's fault ... anybody else's fault ...
All of a sudden, the Yellow-dog-Democrats are interested in Libertarianism ... what's that leopard/spot thingy ...?
He did, it was a trojan 'Invader' that took over my ip address and bombarded me with pop up's of the Drudge Retort.
Ask him
Rex, if you have some evidence of that, you should contact the internet "gods". Rogers is very involved with the elite, and although I seriously doubt your claim, if so you should make it known and make him toast with your evidence.
Don't delay, but if it is the aluminum cooking utensils, etc., speaking, then come on back and fool the old foolers who aren't quite around that corner, yet ... however, I've heard something like this from you before ... more than once if memory serves ...
Otherwise, and in the meantime, why not show your intellectual courage and comment on the subject?
Rex's accusation is completely false.
A published libel!
Perhaps, Rex should study how to say what he wants without doing this, huh? Maybe by saying "perhaps" and turning the comment into a question?
He can't take a hint from the journalist running this blog? You know, like lawyers and Democrats do ...?
Rex is really deficient in the "Sly" department. He's far too direct - probably a reflection of his basic honesty, huh?
He should take a lesson from the more suave of the political propaganda journalists - Yellow-dog-dedicated workers for the People's Progressive Party, over there on the Drudge Retort:
Gal Tuesday slips a few in, "I think these videos need to be played on tv because Palin herself credits him for praying her in being elected governor. Palin is definitely worse than W. At least he took counsel from Billy Graham, not some Christian witch hunter from Kenya. Unbelievable."
The Democrat congress won't address a realistic Energy Bill.
The Democrats refuse to investigate and, or endict Democrat criminals the public has discovered.
The Democrats have, and continue to subvert the success of freeing Iraq.
The Democrats handicap the justice system by refusing to vote for qualified nominations of judges.
The Democrats refuse to acknowledge their responsibility for MortgageGATE.
The Democrats have nominated a stuffed-shirt, know-nothing to be the leader of the greatest nation on Earth, while they scurry around avoiding the nations business to ruin it for votes!
Meanwhile, the innuendo never ceases, the work continues day-and-night to revile and dehumanize a nominee for vice president!!!!!!!!!
They do so by LYING! That's because Gal Tuesday read the article and the quotes and knows very well that Palin's did not CREDIT this preacher because, in the quote at the same time, she said she didn't know herself that she would LATER run for governor.
The preacher's words don't say she is going to be GOVERNOR, only to "make a way" for her career ... Palin said, "He said Lord make a way and let her do this next step."
The poster, Nullifidian (almost certainly a Retort "member") is a true propagandist by using this headline: Palin Linked Electoral Success to Witch Hunter's Prayer.
I can "link" my service at Ft. Stewart, Georgia, to Rogers' son's birth! Does that make me his daddy?
See, Rex? You have to say something like this:
While I was composing here on Rogers' site, I suddenly got a trojan which kept bringing up Drudge Retort windows; one after the other and wouldn't stop.
That's definite LINK to pastor Wright and Obama's true religious faith of Islam!
Reverend Wright damned America and that's why Democrats want to put Obama in office ... to appease their belief in charismatic Christian Islamism.
Rogers is definitely in Reverend Wrights best interests, and since he is so intent on reviling and dehumanizing another person just for their politics ... for votes for his Progressive savior, Barrack Hussein Obama, and Joe Biden, that lobbyist networking champion of the Super Delegates and the Eastern elite establishment ... with a son who is the Attorneys General ... what does he have to worry about the law, huh?
It's all Rogers, and his selective interests in smearing and vilifying through his Retort stooges and his murmurering mob of parrot like mentalities that collectively decide reality over there ...
The Trojan? What dehumanizing, vilifying, reviling for votes yellow-dog-democrat journalist would do a thing like that????
There you go, Rex. Schools out ...
Add a Comment
These HTML tags are permitted: p, b, i, a, and blockquote. A comment may not include more than three links. Participants in this discussion should note the site's moderation policy.
